1Test of Ei(x) vs series expansion


   2000 Random arguments were tested from the interval (  0.187,  0.310)


     EI(X) was larger   268 times,
               agreed   527 times, and
          was smaller  1205 times.


 There are  53 base   2 significant digits in a floating-point number


 The maximum relative error of     0.8281E-15 =    2 ** -50.10
    occurred for X = 0.307741E+00
 The estimated loss of base   2 significant digits is   2.90


 The root mean square relative error was     0.2461E-15 =    2 ** -51.85
 The estimated loss of base   2 significant digits is   1.15


1Test of Ei(x) vs series expansion


   2000 Random arguments were tested from the interval (  0.435,  6.000)


     EI(X) was larger   609 times,
               agreed   695 times, and
          was smaller   696 times.


 There are  53 base   2 significant digits in a floating-point number


 The maximum relative error of     0.1407E-14 =    2 ** -49.34
    occurred for X = 0.592059E+01
 The estimated loss of base   2 significant digits is   3.66


 The root mean square relative error was     0.2426E-15 =    2 ** -51.87
 The estimated loss of base   2 significant digits is   1.13


1Test of Ei(x) vs series expansion


   2000 Random arguments were tested from the interval (  6.000, 12.000)


     EI(X) was larger   636 times,
               agreed   727 times, and
          was smaller   637 times.


 There are  53 base   2 significant digits in a floating-point number


 The maximum relative error of     0.1115E-14 =    2 ** -49.67
    occurred for X = 0.604737E+01
 The estimated loss of base   2 significant digits is   3.33


 The root mean square relative error was     0.1872E-15 =    2 ** -52.25
 The estimated loss of base   2 significant digits is   0.75


1Test of Ei(x) vs series expansion


   2000 Random arguments were tested from the interval ( 12.000, 24.000)


     EI(X) was larger   655 times,
               agreed   698 times, and
          was smaller   647 times.


 There are  53 base   2 significant digits in a floating-point number


 The maximum relative error of     0.6205E-15 =    2 ** -50.52
    occurred for X = 0.181588E+02
 The estimated loss of base   2 significant digits is   2.48


 The root mean square relative error was     0.1783E-15 =    2 ** -52.32
 The estimated loss of base   2 significant digits is   0.68


1Test of Ei(x) vs series expansion


   2000 Random arguments were tested from the interval ( 24.000, 48.000)


     EI(X) was larger   663 times,
               agreed   731 times, and
          was smaller   606 times.


 There are  53 base   2 significant digits in a floating-point number


 The maximum relative error of     0.6231E-15 =    2 ** -50.51
    occurred for X = 0.419004E+02
 The estimated loss of base   2 significant digits is   2.49


 The root mean square relative error was     0.1715E-15 =    2 ** -52.37
 The estimated loss of base   2 significant digits is   0.63


1Test of Ei(x) vs series expansion


   2000 Random arguments were tested from the interval ( -0.250, -1.000)


     EI(X) was larger   526 times,
               agreed   843 times, and
          was smaller   631 times.


 There are  53 base   2 significant digits in a floating-point number


 The maximum relative error of     0.5564E-15 =    2 ** -50.67
    occurred for X =-0.820539E+00
 The estimated loss of base   2 significant digits is   2.33


 The root mean square relative error was     0.1577E-15 =    2 ** -52.49
 The estimated loss of base   2 significant digits is   0.51


1Test of Ei(x) vs series expansion


   2000 Random arguments were tested from the interval ( -1.000, -4.000)


     EI(X) was larger   746 times,
               agreed   480 times, and
          was smaller   774 times.


 There are  53 base   2 significant digits in a floating-point number


 The maximum relative error of     0.9123E-15 =    2 ** -49.96
    occurred for X =-0.270678E+01
 The estimated loss of base   2 significant digits is   3.04


 The root mean square relative error was     0.2538E-15 =    2 ** -51.81
 The estimated loss of base   2 significant digits is   1.19


1Test of Ei(x) vs series expansion


   2000 Random arguments were tested from the interval ( -4.000,-10.000)


     EI(X) was larger   644 times,
               agreed   709 times, and
          was smaller   647 times.


 There are  53 base   2 significant digits in a floating-point number


 The maximum relative error of     0.6010E-15 =    2 ** -50.56
    occurred for X =-0.539779E+01
 The estimated loss of base   2 significant digits is   2.44


 The root mean square relative error was     0.1782E-15 =    2 ** -52.32
 The estimated loss of base   2 significant digits is   0.68




 Test of special arguments


   EI ( 0.375000E+00) =  0.969138E-02


 The relative error is     0.1398E-16 =    2 ** -55.99

 The estimated loss of base   2 significant digits is   0.00


 Test of Error Returns



 EONE will be called with the argument 0.701800E+03
 This should not underflow


 EONE returned the value 0.231901-307



 EONE will be called with the argument 0.701844E+03
 This should underflow


 EONE returned the value 0.000000E+00



 EI will be called with the argument 0.716300E+03
 This should not overflow


 EI returned the value 0.170079+309



 EI will be called with the argument 0.716356E+03
 This should overflow


 EI returned the value 0.179000+309



 EXPEI will be called with the argument 0.449423+308
 This should not underflow


 EXPEI returned the value 0.222507-307



 EI will be called with the argument 0.000000E+00
 This should overflow


 EI returned the value-0.179000+309



 This concludes the tests
